Strategic Management Of Tech. Innovation Pdf Download UPDATED

Strategic Management Of Tech. Innovation Pdf Download

Цитировать:
Guiyu Hu Methodological analysis of the composition of innovation management: competences and the bear upon of its elements on innovation performance // Вопросы инновационной экономики. – 2022. – Том 12. – № one. – doi: 10.18334/vinec.12.ane.114394.

Аннотация:
The purpose of this article is to clarify the master components of the innovation direction competence of high-tech enterprises, and the influence of different competence variables on the innovation performance of high-tech enterprises. Well-nigh of previous enquiry focuses on the impact of innovation management on innovation performance. Few studies accept analyzed the specific components of innovation management competence, and nigh no research has conducted empirically analyzed nearly the contribution of dissimilar innovation direction competence to innovation performance. On the footing of previous research, this article proposes five variables that found the innovation management competence of enterprises, and establishes five hypotheses to demonstrate that the 5 variables have a significant affect on innovation performance. 206 valid data were collected through questionnaire survey of high-tech enterprises. Factor analysis was carried out through SPSS25 to verify the cistron composition of different variables and their contribution to the innovation performance of high-tech enterprises. The inquiry results show that innovation strategic management competence, innovation organizational culture, innovation organizational structure, innovation knowledge direction competence, and innovation project management competence all have a significant positive impact on innovation performance. Scholars who are interested in research on innovation management of high-tech enterprises, the composition of innovation management competences, and enterprise innovation operation can obtain useful information from this article. This paper has an important reference for high-tech enterprises to improve their innovation management competences and improve their innovation performance.

Ключевые слова: innovation management, loftier-tech enterprises, innovation management competence, innovation performance, multiple linear regression assay

Финансирование:
This paper has been supported by the RUDN Academy Strategic Academic Leadership Program.

INTRODUCTION

The main research purpose of this paper is to clarify the constituent factors of innovation management competence and the influence of different factors on innovation performance.

Through the questionnaire survey of high-tech enterprises, 206 valid information were nerveless, and cistron analysis was carried out through SPSS25 to verify the gene composition of different variables and their contribution to the innovation performance of loftier-tech enterprises, and to clarify the composition arrangement of innovation management competences.

About of previous researches are however in the theoretical stage, and the main research content focuses on the importance of innovation direction and the impact of innovation management on innovation performance. Few studies have analyzed the specific components of innovation direction competence, and the specific content of unlike factors. Most no studies have empirically analyzed the contribution of different innovation management competence factors to innovation performance through bodily data.

For companies that desire to truly ameliorate their innovation management competences, needs to clarify the specific limerick of innovation management competences and the contribution of different elements to the comeback of innovation management competences, to realize the optimal allocation of invested innovation resources.

In the first part of this paper, On the basis of previous research the writer puts forwards five hypotheses, namely, innovative strategic direction competences, innovative organizational civilisation, innovative organizational structure, innovative noesis management competences, innovative projection direction ability have a significant positive touch on on innovation performance

The second office mainly focus on the pattern of the questionnaire, including how to develop the scale, and clarifies the variable composition and measurement of innovation management power, and conducts a descriptive statistical assay of the collected questionnaires.

In the third and fourth part of this paper, by using SPSS 25.0 to conduct out the information assay of the relationship betwixt innovation management ability and innovation performance, firstly,Analyze the reliability and validity of the questionnaire, then perform factor analysis on the variables to find out the fundamental factors.Then, carry out multiple regression assay to verify the research hypothesis, clarify the relationship between variables and innovation functioning, and the contribution of different variables to innovation performance.

The research results of this paper have an important reference for high-tech enterprises to improve their innovation direction competences and better their innovation operation. The five components of innovation management competences accept specific corresponding indicators and contents. Enterprises can compare their own development to identify the crusade of low innovation functioning or long-term lack of breakthrough growth in innovation operation. Find the shortcomings of innovation management competences and effectively meliorate innovation operation.

1. Methodological analysis of the limerick of innovation management competences and the impact of its elements on innovation performance

Regarding the limerick of innovation management competence, Mao (2006) believes that innovation direction competences are composed of strategic management competences, technological innovation management competences, market need management competences, and basic direction competences.Per Sundstrom (2009) believes that except innovation strategy perspective, projects management as well important.He proposed that innovation management ability consists of the ability to construct innovative organizational culture, project direction ability and innovative team edifice ability. Tidd (2006) believes that innovation management competence includes a whole procedure of innovation strategy formation and innovation projection implementation.

On the footing of previous research, this paper proposes the five key components of innovation management competence: innovation strategic management competence, innovation organizational construction, innovation organizational culture, innovation knowledge management competence, and innovation project direction competence.

The main purpose of improving innovation management competences of enterprises is to better better innovation functioning. Therefore, this paper establishes the hypothesis that each gene has a pregnant positive impact on innovation functioning.

Innovative strategic management competences

Innovation strategic management means that the enterprise determines its mission, the leadership attaches cracking importance to and supports innovation, and sets the enterprise'southward strategic goals according to the internal and external environment and internal atmospheric condition of the organization.

Richaed Adams [1] and Benn Lawson [2] put frontwards the variables of innovation strategic management competence when analyzing the composition of innovation direction competence. The results of Mao Wuxing's empirical analysis evidence that in that location is a positive correlation between innovation strategic management competence and enterprise innovation performance [3].

Therefore, this study establishes the following assumptions:

Hypothesis 1 : Innovation strategic management competence has a significant positive impact on innovation performance.

Innovative knowledge management competences

Stevenson proposed that the essence of knowledge management is the means and tools used to control enterprise knowledge [4]. Liu proposed that The cognition direction process includes knowledge generation, acquisition, transfer, sharing, storage, reconstruction, utilization and protection [5]. Tanigawa's research shows the specific process mainly includes noesis collection, system, storage, learning, absorption and application [6].

Golden et al. (2001) proposed that knowledge direction competence have an important influence in the technological innovation performance of enterprises [7]. The influence of cognition management power on the performance of technological innovation of enterprises presents structural changes [8].

Therefore, this study establishes the following assumptions:

Hypothesis 2: Innovation knowledge direction power has a pregnant positive touch on on innovation performance.

Innovative organizational structure

The organizational structure that supports innovation and the related organizational characteristics plays an of import role in the implementation of innovation strategies and the development of innovation projects.

Zhao proposed that the formalization and specialization of organizational structures can effectively ameliorate employee's working efficiency and has a positive impact on the operation output [9];

Wang establish that the higher the degree of formalization of the organizational structure, the less resistance it is to coordinate with customers and departments of the enterprise [10]. Nahm'due south written report shows that the formalized organizational structure, the level of horizontal integration and the efficiency of internal communication accept a positive impact on enterprise performance [eleven].

Therefore, the written report established the following hypotheses:

Hypothesis iii: The organizational structure that supports innovation has a pregnant positive impact on innovation performance.

Innovative organizational culture

Organizational civilisation is the spiritual connotation of an organization's values, concepts, beliefs, and habits. Culture that supports innovation can motivate employees to innovate, and encourage employees to continuously pursue culture with an innovative spirit and a spirit of cooperation.

Feng pointed out that organizational culture has a significant positive predictive effect on innovation competence and organizational functioning, and innovation competence plays a sure mediating role in the relationship between organizational culture and organizational performance [12].

Yin's practical study pointed out that corporate culture has a significant impact on innovation cognition, decision-making and performance. The stability of corporate civilisation is as well crucial, and a certain intensity of organizational value orientation are conducive to the credence and implementation of innovation decisions [xiii].

Therefore, this study establishes the following assumptions:

Hypothesis 4: An organizational culture that supports innovation has a meaning positive impact on innovation operation.

Innovative project management competences

Elena Huergo illustrates the touch of engineering management on innovation. Technology management variables including cooperation, technical specialization level, market place demand, innovation planning, innovation monitoring, special technical personnel and then on [14].Thamhain'southward report emphasizes effective communication, effective project planning and support systems, stable long-term organizational goals and priorities that influence innovation performance and innovation outcomes, and illustrates the command of design innovation processes.Mechanisms are very important [15]. Therefore, this study established the following hypotheses:

Hypothesis 5: Innovation project management power has a pregnant positive impact on innovation performance.

Innovation direction competence is a comprehensive competence, different variable of innovation management competence together promote innovation performance. Therefore, this report establishes hypotheses to show the relationship between the master elective variables of innovation management competence and innovation performance, analyzes the impact of variables on innovation functioning.

2. Research design on the relationship between innovation management competence and innovation functioning

In this study, inquiry on the relationship between innovation management ability and innovation functioning the is mainly conduct through questionnaires to collected engagement and make analyses.

The survey process mainly adopts the methods of Email, telephone survey and direct interview. A total of 360 questionnaires were distributed in the enquiry on high-tech enterprises, and 206 valid samples were finally obtained, with an effective charge per unit of 57.2%.

Later analyzing the composition of innovation management variables, this study adult the scale. The evolution of the calibration was mainly based on the research literature, and the scale with loftier reliability and validity was selected.

Table ane- Variable composition and measurement of innovation management competence

Measurement Index of Innovation Strategy Management competence	Sources of Metric Metrics
Specifically for the planning and management of innovation projects, monitoring changes in the internal and external environs of innovation projects	Richard Adams [1] Benn Lawson [2] Xingwu mao [3] Tufan koc [15]
Corporate executives are entrepreneurial and innovation is seen as a key factor affecting organizational success
The company's applied science innovation strategy supports the organization's strategy, and the innovation strategy is shared and applied to each department and project
Measurement Index of Innovative Cognition Direction competence	Sources of Metric Metrics
Innovative ideas come up from different departments of the organization and the quantity and quality of ideas is high	Richard Adams [ane] Aureate [7] Hefeng xie [8] Linjie zhao [16]
Constructive ideas are evaluated, responded to and implemented if justified and innovative ideas are supported by the incentive system
Enterprises will use suppliers or collaborating units, customers, rivals, universities and inquiry institutes to participate in innovation, and employees with special technical skills and technical feel in the project
Measurement Index of Innovative Organizational Structure competence	Sources of Metric Metrics
Frequently communication between the various innovation project teams of the enterprise and betwixt departments	Zhao Xiaolu [nine] Wang Hui [10] Nahm [eleven] Xu Qingrui [17] Tufan koc [18]
There are cross-departmental teams in the business for production and procedure innovation
The enterprise has a good level of matrix management
Enterprises show the characteristics of learning organizations. For example, there are channels for learning and advice, etc.
In team work, piece of work is designed to encourage autonomy
Employees are empowered to brand decisions in innovative projection and take the correct to plan and control management practices.
The design of the corporate organizational structure encourages employees to participate in decision-making
Measurement Alphabetize of Innovative Organizations Cultural competence	Sources of Metric Metrics
Established an incentive machinery for innovative teams	Richard Adams [1] Feng [12] Yin [thirteen] An Jingwen [20]
The organization has a articulate vision and values for innovation, and the business tolerates innovation failures and well-intentioned mistakes, and tolerates risk
Build an atmosphere that fosters innovation, individuals with changing motivations and challenging behaviors
Measurement index of Innovative Project Management competence	Sources of Metric Metrics
Engineers are responsible for innovation and have a responsibility to ensure the implementation of ideas	Elena Huergo [14] Thamhain [15] Xu Qingrui [17] Tufan [eighteen] Per Sundstrom [nineteen]
The organization establishes a rigorous program and establishes milestones, while having the flexibility to solve technical issues, considering plans based on new perspectives and processes
Establish a feedback mechanism to analyze the reasons for changes
Information technology is the responsibility of innovation team members to hash out changes in customer needs through customer feedback, to continuously ameliorate products of innovative projects, and to find technical solutions
Channels and methods of information collection with innovative project development, and a place for communication
Co-ordinate to the feedback data, make adjustments to the changes of innovation projects, and continuously comport out predictions for future innovations

Source: Compiled past the author based on the literature

Innovation functioning and its measurement

The measurement of innovation performance can mensurate the patents applied for and authorized by the visitor, the formulation of industry standards, and the market share of new products. Some studies suggest that innovation output can be measured by patents, including the number of patents, and the successful awarding of patents in a given period. Scherer's research shows that patents are also related to the economy tin can measure the economic effects of patents by the profit of new products [21]. Based on previous research on the measurement indicators of innovation performance, this written report selected four indicators: the company has a satisfactory new product turn a profit margin in the past three years, the market share of the company'due south new products, the company's patent applications in the by three years and in terms of the number of authorizations, the company plays a major office in the conception of industry standards.

Descriptive statistical analysis was carried out on the obtained 206 valid sample data, and the samples of the questionnaires involved enterprises of different natures and industries, which were representative to a sure extent.

Table two- Descriptive Analysis of Questionnaires

Enterprise size	Beneath 100 employees	36.4%
	Between 100-300 employees	23.eight%
	Betwixt 300-500 employees	11.2%
	Between 500-1000 employees	thirteen.6%
	The number of employees is betwixt 1000-2000	ix.7%
	More than than 2000 employees	5.3%
Enterprise nature	State-endemic	five.82%
	State belongings	twenty.9%
	Wholly Foreign Owned Enterprise	viii.73%
	Collectively endemic	1.45%
	Private enterprise	46.half dozen%
	Mixed ownership	sixteen.5%
Industry	Transformation of traditional industries	36.four%
	New cloth technology	6.8%
	Electronics and It	28.6%
	Pharmaceutical biological science	11.2%
	New energy	8.3%
	Resources and Environmental Applied science	2.42%
	High-tech service manufacture	five.8%
	Aerospace	0.48%
R&D investment ratio in 2021	R&D investment 0-v%	16%
	R&D investment 5-10%	44.2%
	R&D investment 10-15%	xviii%
	R&D investment 15-30%	12.1%
	R&D investment of more than 30%	9.vii%

Source: Compiled based on statistical results

3.Empirical Analysis and Research Conclusions of the Touch on of Innovation Direction competence on Innovation Operation

By using SPSS 25.0 to comport out the data analysis of the relationship between innovation direction ability and innovation performance, firstly, the factor analysis is carried out on the variables, and the reliability and validity of the questionnaire are analyzed to discover out the key factors;

The reliability and validity of the questionnaire and the results of cistron assay

Before the cistron analysis, the Bartlett test and KMO value examination used in this study to determine whether the factor analysis is suitable. After factor assay, reliability was tested using Cronbanch's Alpha.

Table 3- KMO values of each measured variable and Bartlett's intensite examination

Measure variable	KMO Values	Bartlett'due south test
		Chi-square approximation	Degrees of freedom	P-value
Innovative strategic management competences	0.770	588.244	3	P<0.001
Innovative knowledge management competences	0.765	479.106	3	P<0.001
Innovative organizational structure	0.943	1550.052	21	P<0.001
Innovative organizational culture	0.764	473.396	3	P<0.001
Innovative projection management competences	0.920	816.889	15	P<0.001
innovation performance	0.849	804.520	6	P<0.001

Source: Arranged based on information analysis results

Both the KMO value and Bartlett'due south test passed the test, indicating that the factor analysis is suitable as it shown in table 3.

Factors Assay of the Variable Innovation Strategic Management competence

In the process of factor analysis in this paper, the factor load of the variable is greater than 0.5 as the standard, and the items that do non see the above requirements are eliminated.

Table 4 -Factor composition of innovation strategy management competence variables

Item	Cistron Limerick
Specifically for the planning and management of innovation projects, monitoring changes in the internal and external environment of innovation projects	0.892
Corporate executives are entrepreneurial and innovation is seen as a key cistron affecting organizational success	0.900
The company's engineering science innovation strategy supports the organization's strategy, and the innovation strategy is shared and applied to each department and project	0.919

Source: Arranged based on data analysis results

The everyman cistron loading is 0.892. The explained variance of the factor is 0.90364>0.5. The Cronbanch's Blastoff value of the generated factor is 0.946>0.7, which indicates that the factor scale is reliable, has passed the consistency test, and has adept reliability.

Table 5- Factor composition of the variables of innovative knowledge management competence

Item	Gene Limerick
Innovative ideas come from different departments of the organization and the quantity and quality of ideas is high	0.878
Constructive ideas are evaluated, responded to and implemented if justified and innovative ideas are supported by the incentive system	0.877
Enterprises will utilize suppliers or collaborating units, customers, rivals, universities and inquiry institutes to participate in innovation, and employees with special technical skills and technical experience in the projection	0.863

Source: Bundled based on data analysis results

It tin be seen from the assay results that the lowest factor loading is 0.863, therefore all the iterms tin be retained. The explained variance of the generation cistron is 0.87299>0.5. The Cronbanch'due south Alpha value is 0.925, which indicates that the factor tabular array is reliable, has passed the consistency examination, and has good reliability.

Table six- Factor limerick of innovative organizational structure

Item	Cistron Composition
Frequently advice between the various innovation project teams of the enterprise and between departments	0.858
There are cantankerous-departmental teams in the business for product and process innovation	0.818
The enterprise has a expert level of matrix management	0.854
Enterprises prove the characteristics of learning organizations. For instance, in that location are channels for learning and advice, etc.	0.777
In team work, piece of work is designed to encourage autonomy	0.723
Employees are empowered to make decisions in innovative projection and have the correct to plan and control management practices.	0.811
The design of the corporate organizational construction encourages employees to participate in decision-making	0.839

Source: Arranged based on data assay results

The everyman cistron loading of the question term is 0.723, therefore all the question terms tin be retained. The explained variance of the generation factor was 0.81136>0.5. The Cronbanch's Alpha value is 0.961, which indicates that the factor table is reliable, and information technology has passed the consistency exam,and has good reliability.

Tabular array seven - Factor composition of innovative organizational culture

Particular	Factor Composition
Established an incentive mechanism for innovative teams	0.880
The organization has a articulate vision and values for innovation, and the business tolerates innovation failures and well-intentioned mistakes, and tolerates risk	0.871
Build an temper that fosters innovation, individuals with changing motivations and challenging behaviors	0.862

Source: Arranged based on data analysis results

The lowest factor loading is 0.880. The explained variance of the cistron is 0.87100>0.five. The Cronbanch's Blastoff value of the generated factor is 0.923>0.vii, which indicates that the factor calibration is reliable, has passed the consistency examination, and has skillful reliability.

Tabular array 8- Factor limerick of innovation project management competence variables

Item	Gene Composition
Engineers are responsible for innovation and have a responsibility to ensure the implementation of ideas	0.802
The organization establishes a rigorous plan and establishes milestones, while having the flexibility to solve technical issues, because plans based on new perspectives and processes	0.721
Establish a feedback mechanism to analyze the reasons for changes	0.710
It is the responsibleness of innovation team members to discuss changes in customer needs through client feedback, to continuously better products of innovative projects, and to find technical solutions	0.714
Channels and methods of information collection with innovative project evolution, and a identify for advice	0.721
According to the feedback information, make adjustments to the changes of innovation projects, and continuously conduct out predictions for future innovations	0.618

Source: Bundled based on data analysis results

The everyman gene loading of this iterm is 0.710, therefore all the terms can be retained. The explained variance of the generation cistron is 0.71437>0.5. The Cronbanch's Alpha value is 0.918, which indicates that the cistron table is reliable, and it has passed the consistency test and has good reliability.

Table nine - Summary of Cronbanch's Alpha values for each measurement variable

Measurement variable	Number of questions	Cronbanch'due south Alpha Value
Innovative strategic management competences	3	0.946
Innovative cognition management competences	7	0.961
Innovative organizational structure	7	0.961
Innovative organizational culture	3	0.923
Innovative project direction competences	6	0.918
Innovation performance	4	0.945

Source: Arranged based on data analysis results

Through factor analysis, the Cronbanch's Blastoff values of the five variables are all >0.7, and the overall reliability meets the requirements. Through the reliability test, the scale used in this written report has a loftier level of reliability.

At the same time, the explained variance of each variable all greater than 0.v, indicating that the scale has a good level of validity.

four.Innovation management and innovation operation regression analysis results

Before conveying out regression assay, test for multicollinearity and normal distribution among variables. After passing the above test, deport out regression analysis on the variables to exam the relationship between each variable and innovation performance.

Multicollinearity exam

Table 10- Results of multicollinearity assay

Variable	Tolerance Statistics	Variance aggrandizement factor (VIF)
Innovative strategic management competences	0.101	9.945
Innovative noesis management competences	0.102	nine.848
Innovative organizational structure	0.123	8.136
Innovative organizational civilization	0.128	7.798
Innovative project direction competences	0.179	5.596

Source: Arranged based on data analysis results

When 0<VIF<x, in that location is no multicollinearity; when 10<VIF<100, there is strong multicollinearity; when VIF>100 , there is severe multicollinearity. If the tolerance of an independent variable is less than 0.1, the collinearity trouble may be serious.

It can be seen from the higher up tabular array that the VIF in all models is less than 10, then there is no close linear relationship betwixt the assumed variables. It can be seen that there is no obvious multicollinearity in this study, and regression analysis tin be carried out.

Normal distribution detection

Whether the data is usually distributed can be observed by using the Q-Q nautical chart, which compares the caste of agreement betwixt the theoretical quantile and the actual quantile. If it obeys a normal distribution, the data points basically coincide with the theoretical straight line .

From the above normal distribution graph, we tin know that the points in the graph are roughly on a direct line, so the data satisfies the normal distribution.

Variable composition of innovation management competence and innovation operation

A regression analysis was carried out on the variables of independent innovation management competence and innovation performance. The fit of the model is shown in the following table with skillful goodness of fit, and the results are shown in Table 11. It shows that the regression relationship can explain more than 95% of the variance of the dependent variable.

Table 11- Goodness of fit of the model

Model	R	R Square	Adjusted R Square
ane	0.979	0.959	0.958

Source: Arranged based on data analysis results

Regression analysis was carried out on innovation performance, and T-examination was used for the results, sig < 0.05, the test results were pregnant, and the original hypothesis was accepted. The regression results are shown in Table 12.

Table 12 - Results of Regression Analysis

Dependent variable	Independent variable	Beta	T	Sig	R²
Innovation Performance	Constant		0.000		0.937
	Innovative strategic direction competences	0.269	five.985	0.000
	innovative organizational structure	0.213	5.231	0.000
	Innovative organizational culture	0.233	5.855	0.000
	Innovative noesis direction competences	0.154	three.442	0.001
	Innovative projection management competences	0.152	4.492	0.000

Source: Arranged based on information assay results

The standardized partial regression coefficient is to compare the degree of influence of each variable through standard normal transformation. It can be used to directly compare the influence degree of the corresponding variable of each variable, and then the coefficient of the regression equation here can be used to decide the importance and weight of the variable.

According to the results of empirical assay, innovation strategic management competence, innovation organizational structure, innovation organizational civilisation, innovation noesis direction competence, and innovation project management competence all have a significant positive bear upon on innovation performance.The correlation coefficients between the five variables and innovation performance are shown in Tabular array 14.

Table xiv- Research model of the relationship between innovation management competence and innovation performance

Innovation Performance
Variable	Correlation Coefficient
Innovative strategic direction competences	0.269
innovative organizational structure	0.213
Innovative organizational culture	0.233
Innovative knowledge management competences	0.154
Innovative project management competences	0.152

Source: Arranged based on information assay results

Through regression analysis, it tin can be seen that the influence of each component variable on innovation performance is different, and the relative importance of each component variable can be judged by the correlation coefficient.

The innovation strategy management variables shows the most significant human relationship with innovation performance. Therefore, organizations need to attach importance to the accumulation of knowledge, establish a noesis transformation and learning machinery, and at the same fourth dimension bear out organizational innovation strategy management, promote the participation of project-level personnel in the formulation of organizational strategies, and ensure the sharing of innovation strategies in the organization.

The innovation organization culture has the second influence on innovation functioning. A corporate culture that supports innovation can motivate employees to innovate, and encourage employees to continuously pursue excellence.

The innovation arrangement structure has the third influence on innovation performance. It is necessary to build a flexible and diversified arrangement that tin promote employee participation in decision-making, empower employees to accept autonomy in the organization.

Innovation knowledge management ability as well has a significant impact on innovation performance. The ability to generate high-quality innovative ideas in an organization and to ensure that innovative ideas tin can be selected and evaluated and implemented in the organization is a major factor affecting organizational innovation performance.

Innovation project management competences also have an important impact on innovation performance. Establish flexible plans in the arrangement, constitute milestones, and coordinate through plan implementation and meetings. At the same time, ensure that team members have a sense of responsibleness for innovation, detect issues, collect information, and brand team members responsible for innovation through task decomposition and responsibleness decomposition.

Decision

On the basis of previous research, this paper combines the theoretical analysis of innovation management competence, equally well as the assay of the connotation and status quo of innovation management competence of high-tech enterprises, puts forward five hypotheses that is five variables, namely innovation strategic management competence, innovation knowledge management competence, innovation organizational structure, innovative organizational culture and innovative project management ability, all take significant positive furnishings on innovation functioning.

The information collection method of this study was mainly through questionnaires.The survey objects are mainly high-tech enterprises that bear out innovation activities. 206 valid data were collected through questionnaire survey.

After collecting the data, cistron analysis is carried out on the variables firstly, the reliability and validity of the questionnaire are analyzed, and the key factors of each variable are found out. Secondly, use SPSS25 to conduct out multiple linear regression analysis to verify the research hypothesis and analyze the contribution of unlike variables to innovation operation.

According to the results of empirical analysis, all five variables take a significant positive impact on innovation performance, in descending order of influence, innovation strategy management competence, innovation organizational civilisation, innovation organizational construction, innovation knowledge direction competence, and innovation project management competence.

The research results of this newspaper have an of import reference value for high-tech enterprises to better their innovation management competences and amend innovation performance. The 5 components of innovation management competences accept specific respective indicators and contents.

Enterprises can identify the reasons for depression innovation operation or the long-term lack of breakthrough growth in innovation performance, find the shortcomings of innovation management competences, and effectively ameliorate innovation performance

one. Adams R., Bessant J., Phelps R. Innovation direction measurement: A review // International Periodical of Innovation Management Review. – 2006. – № eight(1). – p. 21-47.
two. Benn Lawson, Danny Samson Developing innovation competence in organizations: a dynamic competences arroyo // International Journal of Innovation Management. – 2001. – № 5(3).
3. Mao Wuxing Research on Enterprise'southward Comprehensive Innovation Direction competence: Taking China's Electronic Information Manufacture as an Example. / PhD Thesis. - Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2006.
4. Stevenson H., Gumpert D. The heart of entrepreneurship. - MA: Harford Business organisation School Press, 1985. – 184 p.
5. Liu Lei, Qiao Zhong, Liu Chang Research on the cooperative game trouble in the docking mode of agronomics and supermarket // Chinese Journal of Direction Engineering. – 2012. – № 4. – p. 100-105.
6. Tanigawa, An Yufa, Liu Chang Research on the quality control strength in the mode of "agronomical-supermarket docking" // Soft Science. – 2011. – № 25(half-dozen). – p. 21-24.
7. Aureate A.H., Malhotra A., Segars A.H. Knowledge management: An Organizational competences perspective // Journal of Direction Data Systems. – 2001. – № eighteen. – p. 185-214.
eight. Xie Hefeng The Impacts of Enterprise's Knowledge Management competences on Technological Innovation Performance // Journal of Academy of South Cathay (Social Scientific discipline Edition). – 2012. – № viii. – p. 43-48.
9. Zhao Xiaolu An Empirical Written report on the Organizational Structure and Operation of Enterprises. - Xidian Academy, 2008. – 48-l p.
10. Wang Hui, Chen Jianbin, Li Yuxia An empirical study on the human relationship betwixt enterprise IT functioning and organizational structure dimension // Management Review. – 2011. – № five. – p. 47.
11. Nahm A.Y., Vonderembse M. A., Koufteros X. A. The touch on of organizational construction on time-based manufacturing and plant performance // Journal of Operations Management. – 2003. – № 21(3). – p. 281-303. – doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00107-9.
12. Feng Cailing The influence of organizational culture on organizational performance // Ludong University. – 2019. – № 35(2). – p. 180-184.
13. Yin Chong Management Science and Engineering // Shandong University. – 2009. – № 19(1). – p. 25-36.
fourteen. Elena Huergo The role of technological direction equally a source of innovation: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms // Research Policy. – 2006. – № 35. – p. 1377-1388.
xv. Thamhain H.J. Managing technologically innovation squad efforts toward new product success // Journal of Product Innovation Direction. – 1990. – № seven. – p. v-xviii.
16. Zhao Linjie, Tang Shukun A new technology innovation management tool - Innovation Management Maturity Model Research (IMMM) // Business. – 2007. – № x. – p. 81-87. – doi: 168011090.
17. Xu Qingrui Comprehensive Innovation Management Theory and Practice. - Beijing: Scientific discipline Press, 2007.
18. Tufan Koc, Cemil Ceylan Factors impacting the innovation capacity in large scale companies // Technovation. – 2007. – № 27. – p. 105-114.
19. Per Sundstrom, Annika Zika-Viktorsson Organizing for innovation in a product evolution project: Combining innovative and issue oriented ways of working - A case study // International Periodical of Innovation Management. – 2009. – № 27. – p. 745-753.
20. An Jingwen, Li Yuanchun, Liu Haidong, Zhen Haihong, Liang Ruiwen Research on the evaluation alphabetize system of enterprise technological innovation competence maturity // China Science and Applied science Forum. – 2006. – p. 19.
21. Scherer R. A New Typology for Organizations: Market, Bureaucracy, Clan and Mission, with Application to American Denominations // Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. – 1988. – doi: 10.2307/1386945.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Posted by: lewisgrequod.blogspot.com